Diffusion language models generate text by repeatedly refining a masked sequence. Each prediction can use context from both sides of a token. Most of these models use Transformer denoisers, so they still pay the quadratic cost of self-attention.
DiffuMamba (Singh et al., 2025) showed that Mamba-based, linear-time scans can work as diffusion denoisers. Other recurrent architectures have received less attention.
RWKV-7's rank-1 state update is a strictly more expressive recurrence than Mamba-2's diagonal decay. We want to test whether that difference helps a denoiser combine context from both directions.
We analyze how much the paired forward and backward states can represent, then compare small-to-mid-scale models against Transformer, bidirectional Mamba-2 (DiffuMamba and DiffuMamba-H), causal-only, and sparse-attention-hybrid baselines. We measure denoising perplexity, sampling efficiency, scaling with sequence length, and retrieval using MQAR and S-NIAH probes.
We want to find out whether RWKV-7 can denoise as well as these alternatives at the same parameter count. This work also supports our effort to convert autoregressive Transformers into diffusion models without attention. We aren't trying to build a frontier model in this evaluation.
We study that conversion in DreamingGoose →