Obit's distributed inference network needs to work with machines we don't control. The workers on those machines can see model shards and intermediate states, which creates a risk of model-weight theft.
This is a narrower goal than "private inference" or cryptographic model confidentiality. RBWO sits between sending plaintext weights to workers and using full confidential computing.
We don't claim stronger formal security than FHE, MPC or GPU TEEs. Those approaches target different security properties and still cost minutes per token at 7B. RBWO may be easier to deploy on commodity and marketplace GPUs. It also aims to prevent reuse of stolen weights, while watermarking and fingerprinting help identify misuse after it happens. We still need to measure throughput and practical resistance to theft.
A prototype needs to measure whether an attacker can recover a usable model, as well as the effect on accuracy and latency. Preserving quality and speed isn't enough if the weights can still be stolen. The intended protection is computational and economic, rather than a cryptographic guarantee.